Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Posts by category

Follow Me

The Sounding Board

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Tech PR and Product Journalism: Give the People What They Want

  
  
  

Steve Jobs resized 600

Yes, tech product PR has been around for a while.  No, Steve didn't invent it.

Just saw this interesting take by Tom Foremski of ZDNet on why tech PR is so hot these days.  In a nutshell, Foremski writes that companies are putting more money towards PR to promote their products due to public relations’ efficacy over advertising.  He argues that this is a recent shift that has been dictated by consumers’ desire to analyze just about every tech product that comes down the pike.  This is driven by an insatiable thirst for product specs, benchmarks, and more, driven by the seemingly unending stream of cool technology that seems to make an appearance, on average, once or twice a week.

Foremski writes:

“Over the past two decades tech companies have been steadily shifting their substantial marketing funds into public relations, with the express goal to have news stories published about them and their products.

The reason is simple: Advertising is only one-third as effective as a news story about a company or product.

PR is much more efficient than advertising, you get far more marketing bang.”

I’m not going to argue with him, of course.  I do think you get more “marketing bang” out of a well-planned, strategic PR campaign that can truly educate people, through journalists, about products and services (then again, I guess I am a bit biased!). 

I don’t necessarily agree, however, that this is necessarily something new.  After all, technology companies have been pitching products – everything from laptops to databases and beyond – for years.  And PR firms have offered full-fledged product review programs for years as well. 

I do think, though, that in our spec-obsessed world PR has become increasingly important when it comes to product marketing.  Think of the latest Android device; it’s awful hard to get across the concept of the (at least perceived) importance of dual-core processors and Tegra 2 chips in an ad.  Just doesn’t work.  But many people do care about these things.  The place to publicize them – perhaps the only really effective place – is through an article or review.

So while I think product PR has certainly accelerated, I don’t think it’s necessarily because tech companies are putting more ammunition behind it.  It’s something that has been caused by consumers’ need for detailed information. 

In other words, the market is demanding more and more information; product PR is stepping up to the plate to provide it. 

- Pete Larmey

Comments

I think you mean Tom Foremski? 
 
You completely missed Tom's point. Nowhere does he argue that consumers drove this change or even want articles that regurgitate vendor information. He is saying that the quality of technology journalism has declined. 
 
Tom says, "You'd think the tech media sites would prefer advertising money for product launches rather than reporting them for free. After all, there are far more interesting stories to write...The future of tech journalism is certainly not in product journalism." 
 
He is right! 
 
On product details, you say that "The place to publicize them – perhaps the only really effective place – is through an article or review."  
 
Certainly that is not true!! Wouldn't a product webpage with specs be more appropriate and effective? Publications do not need to waste space blindly reporting on specifications. Reviews can and should call out highlights, but with the purpose of offering an educated opinion of their value. 
 
Tom's point is simple and correct..... more reporting and fewer articles that regurgitate press releases are good for everyone.
Posted @ Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:22 PM by Geoff
Hi Geoff, 
 
Thanks for your comment and the catch on Tom's name - fixed that! 
 
I actually do get what he's saying, and understand that many journalists recite product specs (for example) in their articles as if cutting and pasting directly from a news release. But one of my points -- which, perhaps, I didn't make as clearly as I could have -- is the reason for this approach is simply that consumers are seemingly becoming increasingly interested in these types of things. That's one reason why sites like The Verge, Gizmodo, Engadget, TechCrunch, etc. are so popular - people seem to have a hunger for every last detail of every last product. And you're right - a product webpage is a place for this. I would also argue there's a place for it in PR, as well -- precisely because there IS an audience out there for it. 
 
To your point about "regurgitating press releases" -- couldn't agree more. In fact, I do not and never have been of the opinion that press releases are the final statement in regards to ANY announcement. To me, they're a starting off point for (hopefully) a more in-depth analysis that can include interviews with company spokespeople, third party analysts, and others, for a complete, well-rounded story. 
 
Thanks, 
Pete
Posted @ Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:59 PM by Pete Larmey
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics